I think it’s best for me to list all the good and bad things about this episode (I should remind you that its all my just opinion, and if you disagree then thats fine and I would actually find it really interesting to know why):
GOOD:
- The humour was surprisingly great. For a while I thought Moffat didn’t have a sense of humour, but then I saw ‘Sherlock’ and realised that Moffat just has days when he doesn’t want to be funny – just like he has days when he doesn’t want to be a good writer.
- Moffat has clearly studied ‘The Two Doctors’, ‘The Three Doctors’ and ‘The Five Doctors’ – as the interactions between each Doctor is brilliant. It was sort of like ‘The Avengers’, only on about one thousanth of the budget
- Oh, I missed you David. You’re from a golden time when Doctor Who made no sense in a silly, overly-camp, farting-aliens way – rather than a plot-holey, first-draft-will-do, needs-a-diagram-to-explain-what’s-going-on way.
- John Hurt can do no wrong. I still can’t believe they actually got him to do this, but he is every bit as incredible as I expected him to be. I demand more of him, even if it doesn’t make sense within the canon.
- I was worried that Matt would be overshadowed. I mean, you have two Shakesperean actors acting their acting-pants off here. But Matt manages to stand out as a unique personality.
- I’m actually really starting to warm to Clara as a character – more so than Amy, possibly because she doesn’t have an infuriating boyfriend.
Spoiler (click to read)
- The brief 10 sec clip of the 12th Doctor made me produce a strange high-pitched noise.
- I am indifferent to Rose’s inclusion. She’s fairly pointless, and was clearly only shoved in for fan-service – but she’s technically not actually Rose, and she did an OK job. So whatever.
- NO RIVER SONG!!
BAD:
- You probably knew this complaint was coming, but, like a teacher inevitably having to punish a pupil for writing nothing but “All Work and No Play Makes Jack a Dull Boy” on his essay – I have to complain about the ret-con.
Spoiler (click to read)
So…it turns out the Time Lords WEREN’T wiped out. Rather than being destroyed in a tragic event that shifted the very nature of the universe and traumatised the Doctor – shaping him into the being we see today, they are stuck in a painting.
Again: that dramatic event that shaped the entire course of the show….NEVER HAPPENED. This is the equivalent of the Eighth Doctor waking up and saying “What a horrible dream!” In fact, I would have rather that.
Moffat: What is it with you and messing overarching stories up? You’re a good writer, as you proved during the first half of this episode. At times you’re a great writer, as you’ve proven with ‘Sherlock’ and your RTD-era episodes. Why do you keep ret-conning stuff?
First you made it so the Dalek’s don’t know who the Doctor is, thus removing their long-running rivalry that has been in place since the second ever episode of Doctor Who and is…sorry, WAS the only reason why the Dalek’s were threatening in the first place. This is a move I will never forgive you for, even if you make Peter Capaldi’s Doctor exactly like Malcolm Tucker.
And now you’ve made it so the Doctor has literally done nothing he’s ever regretted. The conclusion to the Time War is the only real dark edge the Doctor has had. It’s an event that proves he’s an imperfect character – and it is imperfections that make characters actually INTERESTING. John Hurt is so brilliant in this because you can just see in his eyes the weight of this situation. It is tearing him apart. It is making him an actual human character. And I really liked Christopher Eccleston’s Doctor because he also carries this weight. Wiping out the Time Lord’s was the best decision RTD ever made, because it made the Doctor a lone traveller – a world-weary soul who hops around in time and space because it’s the only thing he has to live for.
But no more. Thank you Moffat. The Doctor is now nothing but Superman in space.
In fact, the episodes conclusion was basically like the first Superman movie in how it made absolutely no sense, spawned a billion plot-holes, and made it so there were no consequences at all. No-one has learnt anything. This episode might as well have just not happened for all the good it does for the Doctor’s character-arc.
I would also complain about how it’s not explained where all those Dalek’s went to – but since there are still so bloody many floating about in space, it actually makes sense that they didn’t get wiped out.
Spoiler (click to read)
- Um…it was undeniably cool seeing stock-footage and badly photoshopped images of all the past Doctors. But…how did the Doctor(s) contact them? Matt Smith couldn’t have just popped up on their monitors and said “Hey! I’m you from a future generation where everything goes all flashy and Hollywood-y and young. Fancy helping me completely break the laws of time and space?”
- Also - Tom Baker? It would have been fine if he was just a quick cameo – but…did they actually acknowledge the fact that he was a Doctor? (“or…maybe I am you..”) Because I don’t think I need to explain why that makes absolutely no sense.
- I hated the girl in the scarf. She was a pathetic fan-surrogate who should have been cut during the first draft.
- A nuke under London? Was this explained in a previous episode? Because…yeah…kinda a big plot-point to drop on us.
Overall, I might actually watch this episode again, but turn it off during the last ten mins and put my hands over my ears. In a few years time, I might mellow-out a bit (like I’ve done for a lot of Series 5 and some of Series 6) but, as I said, I don’t think I can forgive this show for that ending.