Bricks in Motion
We are a friendly filmmaking community devoted to the art of stop-motion animation using LEGO® and similar construction toys. Here, you can share your work, join our community of other brickfilmers, and participate in periodic animation contests!
A place to discuss, share, and create stop motion films.
Ad
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
The Package II - Redherring
The sequel to "The Package" In which a Package must be delivered, although this time, the package is not what it seems.
I hope you can look past the technical flaws, which were mainly unavoidable, without major re filming
I watched it way before you posted it here. It had a bad ass plot. But Light Flickers in the beginnning a the night scene. 
But still great 
It was pretty good. The length doesn't have to be 30+ min. You could have made it a solitary sort of thing. The plot was very well planned & it had a very cinematic feel (which is what we adore). The CGI was fantastic! I don't know if you did it yourself, or if you collaborated with Gareth, but it was movie level CGI, almost to the point of PIXAR or Dream Works. The animation was what kind of let me down though. It was kind of choppy at parts, but the sets were good to enhance the animation. This I say was a well collaborated project, I say, & was worth watching (Although I couldn't watch it all the way through at one seating). 4/5.
but it was movie level CGI, almost to the point of PIXAR or Dream Works.
Sorry but, No. Just no.
I would like to know if any of you guys can tell me how to improve on the animation, despite thinking it's ok, I do realise that there are some noticeable flaws. The main reason is that I wanted to get this out rather than cancel, so I couldn't afford to be perfectionist.
but it was movie level CGI, almost to the point of PIXAR or Dream Works.
Hahahaha, I can't stop laughing. Have you actually watched any professional animated movies?
The animation was pretty good, to improve it I would basically just keep animating, trying to refine it a little more each time.
Juggernaut Pictures wrote:but it was movie level CGI, almost to the point of PIXAR or Dream Works.
Hahahaha, I can't stop laughing. Have you actually watched any professional animated movies?
Dido
.
Dido
...The singer?
Anyway, I love this movie. It may technically not be consistent or groundbreaking, but the point in film making is to entertain which is exactly what The Package II does in spades.
If you're a person who's too shallow to see past the technicalities to the heart and soul of the film itself then you clearly aren't qualified to comment.
^ He means 'ditto' which means 'same'.
What I meant was, there really wasn't any comparison to his CGI. It does not mean he is better than the best 3D Animation companies of all time. I couldn't find a better comparison, except for now that I can think a little clearer, probably James W's Clone wars movie, Smeagol's films, & some of Gareth's CGI.
What I meant was, there really wasn't any comparison to his CGI. It does not mean he is better than the best 3D Animation companies of all time. I couldn't find a better comparison, except for now that I can think a little clearer, probably James W's Clone wars movie, Smeagol's films, & some of Gareth's CGI.
*facepalm* Gareth did a lot of Cgi in that film. 
.I wasn't sure.
my band used to be called red herring.
Juggernaut Pictures wrote:What I meant was, there really wasn't any comparison to his CGI. It does not mean he is better than the best 3D Animation companies of all time. I couldn't find a better comparison, except for now that I can think a little clearer, probably James W's Clone wars movie, Smeagol's films, & some of Gareth's CGI.
*facepalm* Gareth did a lot of Cgi in that film.
Umm, Gareth did 2 scenes, I did the rest
Yeah, I thought you did the majority of scenes. Still very good.
He put a lot of effort...Don't get me wrong, you are GREAT at CGI, I just wanted to make a point to JP
.Thanks, anyways. I find this far better than the first package, seeing past the flaws, you've got yourself a great film. I don't think a lot of people are taking into consideration the amount of time you put into it. Yes it could be much better, but it's life.
.Thanks, anyways. I find this far better than the first package, seeing past the flaws, you've got yourself a great film. I don't think a lot of people are taking into consideration the amount of time you put into it. Yes it could be much better, but it's life.
Thank you kindly, I do actually acknowledge all the flaws, but I was personally very happy with the result, if I really wasn't happy I wouldn't have released.
I deleted some offtopic arguments. In the future, let's try to discuss the film and ONLY the film. This is Saminatorger's thread to get feedback. You may present your opinions on his film, but keep things on topic, and try to offer constructive criticism.
Thanks Squash. I acted kind of jerky, but now it's all deleted. I still love your CGI though, Saminatorger.
Posts [ 1 to 20 of 38 ]
