You are not logged in. Please login or register.
A place to discuss, share and create stop motion films.
Hi, everybody 
The current Rating System is pretty good, but I got an idea, to improve it...
Here's a picture of my concept: http://i.imgur.com/ZvOM3.jpg
With the new Members Rating System, it would be easier for the reviewers because they don't have to give a rating on all the ''Unrecommended films''... Maybe my idea is bad, maybe not.
In fact, I don't know if this new Rating System is really better... That's just a simple idea, lol 
I like it! 
I think it's fair to let the members make ratings while still keeping the staff rating. The idea of adding more stars also sounds better, too. Like on IMDb, all rating are out of ten. I also like the "overall" part under the bricks/stars because a lot of the time, there is a fraction of a brick/star and your not sure what the heck it is.
If I were Sméagol, I'd take this idea into consideration.
-LASF
The idea of adding more stars also sounds better, too. Like on IMDb, all rating are out of ten. I also like the "overall" part under the bricks/stars because a lot of the time, there is a fraction of a brick/star and your not sure what the heck it is.
Yeah, I agree with you Thanks.
Personally I like the idea - add in quotes from members reviews and you a new review panel-ish thing. It'd encourage members to write better reviews and cut back on the job of the review panelists. MPFist0 and Vik are two prime examples of excellent member reviewers.
Just a thought.
Opening up the 'staff ratings' system to a larger population of people and renaming it something else is definitely a possibility. We'll probably experiment a bit with this stuff once we get the new setup worked out and see what works.
Does this concept is still relevant, or not?
I wanna do something to the rating system so it's actually useful again. Maybe this summer I'll have time to sort out. I'm really busy with university right now.
Ok. Thanks, and good luck
If you need more ideas, I'm available
Posts [ 8 ]
[ Generated in 0.060 seconds, 9 queries executed ]
